Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 60, Issue 5 , Pages 786-791, May 2009

Medium-dose is more effective than low-dose ultraviolet A1 phototherapy for localized scleroderma as shown by 20-MHz ultrasound assessment

  • Paul-Gunther Sator, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Sonja Radakovic, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Karl Schulmeister, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Austrian Research Centers GesmbH, Seibersdorf, Austria
  • ,
  • Herbert Hönigsmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Adrian Tanew, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Adrian Tanew, MD, Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Accepted 7 December 2008. published online 11 February 2009.

Background

Recent studies suggest that ultraviolet (UV) A1 phototherapy is an effective treatment for localized scleroderma (LS); however, the optimum UVA1 dose remains to be determined.

Objective

We sought to compare the immediate and long-term efficacy of low- versus medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy for plaque-type LS.

Methods

Three comparable plaques in 16 patients were treated with 20 J/cm2 UVA1, 70 J/cm2 UVA1, or no irradiation. In total, 30 treatments were given. Skin thickness was determined by high-frequency ultrasound examination and clinical scoring. Assessments were done at baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter.

Results

Ultrasound measurement showed a significantly greater reduction of skin thickness with 70 J/cm2 than with 20 J/cm2 at all time points of the study except immediately after UVA1 treatment. The clinical score of the irradiated plaques also decreased substantially but failed to detect a significant difference between the two dose regimens.

Limitations

Our results only pertain to plaque-type LS and are limited by a small sample size.

Conclusion

Medium-dose provides for better long-term results than low-dose UVA1 in LS as shown by ultrasound assessment. With clinical scoring, no significant difference between the two UVA1 dose regimens was detected, indicating that ultrasound measurement is a more sensitive method for quantifying treatment-induced skin changes in patients with LS.

Key words: comparison of low- and medium-dose UVA1, high-frequency ultrasound, long-term follow-up, LS, UVA1 phototherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources: None.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

PII: S0190-9622(08)02496-1

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.12.013

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 60, Issue 5 , Pages 786-791, May 2009