Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 48, Issue 5 , Pages 714-720, May 2003

Analysis of patients with suspected photosensitivity referred for investigation to an Australian photodermatology clinic☆☆★★

Melbourne, Australia

From the University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine (Dermatology),a and Department of Dermatology,b St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne

Accepted 22 May 2002.

Abstract 

Background: Australia's first dedicated photodermatology clinic was established at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne in 1993. Objective: We sought to review clinical diagnoses and results of investigations performed on patients seen at this institution. Methods: A database was created to enable a retrospective and prospective analysis of all patients attending for evaluation of suspected photosensitivity from April 1993 to October 2000. Results: A total of 513 patients were seen, 289 (56.3%) female and 224 (43.7%) male, with a mean age of 45.2 years (range: 2.6-85.9). A photosensitive disorder was diagnosed in 397 patients (77.4%), with the acquired idiopathic photodermatoses accounting for diagnoses in 215 (41.9%) of all patients seen. The most common diagnosis was polymorphous light eruption. Reduced minimal erythema doses were seen in 25.3% of all patients light tested. In those photopatch tested, 23.3% had at least 1 photocontact reaction. Allergic contact dermatitis in a photosensitive distribution was diagnosed in 7.4% of the clinic population. Conclusion: A large proportion of referrals to a photodermatology clinic comprise people with acquired idiopathic photodermatoses, with other common diagnoses that may mimic photosensitivity including allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, and rosacea. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:714-20.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources: None.

☆☆ Conflict of interest: None identified.

 Reprints not available.

★★ 0190-9622/2003/$30.00 + 0

PII: S0190-9622(03)00025-2

doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.219

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 48, Issue 5 , Pages 714-720, May 2003