Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 25-32, July 2004

Comparison of selective retinoic acid receptor– and retinoic X receptor–mediated efficacy, tolerance, and survival in cutaneous t-cell lymphoma

This study was presented at the 12th Meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology, Barcelona, Spain, October 17, 2003.

From the Departments of Dermatologya and Medicine,b Division of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine,c Northwestern UniversityUSA

Accepted 4 November 2003.

Chicago, Illinois

Abstract 

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with varied clinical presentation and prognosis. The most common subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are the epidermotropic variants mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Treatment of mycosis fungoides has encompassed a variety of modalities including the use of retinoids with several studies evaluating their efficacy. The reported benefits and duration of response have varied in published data. The biological effect of retinoids is mediated by specific receptor families, retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoic X receptor (RXR), with subsequently altered gene expression. There are no data available on cutaneous T-cell lymphomas that compare RAR and RXR retinoids. The objective of our retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center study was to compare the response, survival outcomes, and toxic effects in our phase II trial of the RAR-specific retinoid, all-trans retinoic acid, with clinical use of the RXR-specific retinoid, bexarotene, in patients with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome who have relapsed. There was no statistical difference in response rates (12% vs 21%), response duration (20.5 vs 7.3 months), event-free survival time (4 vs 5 months), or median survival when corrected for length of follow-up. Both have favorable toxicity profiles that can be managed with medications. The toxicity profile caused by bexarotene seems to be more limited to laboratory values and better tolerated, although generally associated with more severe grades of toxicity. In conclusion, both retinoids have modest objective response rates and, therefore, most likely will have limited impact as monotherapeutic agents. However, the immunomodulatory effects of RAR and RXR retinoids provide a rational basis for using retinoids in combination with other biologic immune response modifiers, phototherapy, or cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Abbreviations:  ATRA, all-trans-retinoic acid, CR, complete response, CTCL, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, MF, mycosis fungoides, NCI, National Cancer Institute, PD, progressive disease, PR, partial response, RAR, retinoic acid receptor, RXR, retinoic X receptor, SS, Sézary syndrome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the American Cancer Society (Dr Kuzel is a Clinical Career Development Award Recipient).Disclosure: Drs Guitart, Kuzel, and Rosen received honoraria for speakers for Ligand Pharmaceuticals. Drs Kuzel and Guitart are clinical investigators for studies with Ligand Phamaceuticals.

PII: S0190-9622(03)04538-9

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2003.11.058

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 25-32, July 2004