Journal Home
Search for

Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 801-807 (May 2009)


View previous. 20 of 53 View next.

Comparison of a 585-nm pulsed dye laser and a 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of acne scars: A randomized split-face clinical study

Dong Hun Lee, MDa, Yu Sung Choi, MDab, Seong Uk Min, MDab, Mi Young Yoon, BSb, Dae Hun Suh, MD, PhDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address

published online 17 February 2009.

Background

No studies have reported a comparison of the pulsed dye laser (PDL) and the 1064-nm long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser treatment of acne scars in the same patient.

Objective

To compare the efficacies of these two lasers in the treatment of acne scars.

Methods

Eighteen patients received 4 sessions of PDL or Nd:YAG laser at 2-week intervals in a randomized split-face manner.

Results

Both lasers induced notable and comparable improvement in the appearance of acne scars, particularly superficial scars, with significant reductions in the scores associated with the clinical evaluation scale for acne scarring (ECCA). Histologic evaluations revealed significant increases in collagen production and deposition following both lasers. Patient satisfaction scores concurred with these improvements. Ice-pick scars and boxcar scars tended to respond better to PDL and Nd:YAG lasers, respectively.

Limitations

The number of subjects was small.

Conclusions

Both lasers are effective modalities for the treatment of acne scars. Optimal outcomes might be achieved considering scar types and responses to a specific laser.

a Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

b Acne Research Laboratory, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dae Hun Suh, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.

 Dong Hun Lee, MD, and Yu Sung Choi, MD, contributed equally to this work as first authors.

 Funding sources: None.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

PII: S0190-9622(08)02454-7

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.883


View previous. 20 of 53 View next.