Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 61, Issue 6 , Pages e31-e47, December 2009

Over-the-counter scar products for postsurgical patients: Disparities between online advertised benefits and evidence regarding efficacy

Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

published online 21 October 2009.

Surgical patients frequently read about over-the-counter (OTC) scar products online and ask physicians for advice about product use. We summarized the characteristics of the 20 best-selling scar products on the Web site drugstore.com and reviewed the medical literature for data supporting the efficacy of OTC scar products used on fresh postsurgical wounds. Products had an average price of $16.25 (range $9.49-$59.99) and an average of 9.2 ingredients (range 1-29). Silicone, vitamin E, and onion extract were common ingredients. Although weak evidence indicates that silicone gel dressings may improve postsurgical scar appearance, published evidence does not support postoperative use of most scar products. However, many products have multiple ingredients, and few clinical trials assess the ingredient combinations of specific products. The practical information about OTC scar products and published efficacy data found in this review may help physicians to counsel patients about postsurgical product use and counter unrealistic expectations gained from online advertisements.

Abbreviations used: FDA, Food and Drug Administration, OTC, over-the-counter

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources: None.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0190-9622(09)00383-1

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.046

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 61, Issue 6 , Pages e31-e47, December 2009