Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 61, Issue 6 , Pages 986-992, December 2009

Preoperative skin and nail preparation of the foot: Comparison of the efficacy of 4 different methods in reducing bacterial load

  • Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo, DPM, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Escuela Universitaria de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo, DPM, PhD, Escuela Universitaria de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  • ,
  • Marta Elena Losa Iglesias, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Luis Alou Cervera, BSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • David Sevillano Fernández, BPharm

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • José Prieto Prieto, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Accepted 22 April 2009. published online 10 August 2009.

Background

Orthopedic surgical procedures involving the foot and ankle are associated with high rates of infection. The optimal method of preparing the skin and nails for foot and ankle surgery remains unknown.

Objective

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of 4 different methods of skin and nail preparation of the foot using various antiseptic solutions.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized study, 4 methods of skin and nail preparation were compared in terms of their efficacy in eliminating bacteria from the hallux nailfold and first web space of the normal foot in 28 healthy adult volunteers. Efficacy was determined by evaluating the difference in the total bacterial load before and after skin preparation. The foot-preparation solutions evaluated were 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, 70% isopropyl alcohol, and 7.5% to 10% povidone-iodine.

Results

The addition of alcohol to povidone-iodine was found to increase the efficacy of the preparation method. The nailfold remained contaminated after any of the preoperative skin- and nail-preparation methods studied.

Limitations

This study did not measure clinically relevant infections, and the results may not correlate with decreased rates of infection after surgery.

Conclusion

Incorporation of alcohol and povidone-iodine into the preoperative skin- and nail-preparation process may help reduce the bacterial load. Every effort should be made to lower the risk of contamination from the nail.

Key words: antiseptic, bacterial load, foot surgery, infection, preoperative skin preparation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources: None.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

PII: S0190-9622(09)00545-3

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.045

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 61, Issue 6 , Pages 986-992, December 2009