Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 62, Issue 6 , Pages 929.e1-929.e9, June 2010

Estimated equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral vitamin D supplementation across seasons at two US latitudes

  • Vitaly Terushkin, BS

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
    • These two authors have equal responsibility for the work described herein.
  • ,
  • Anna Bender, MD

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
    • These two authors have equal responsibility for the work described herein.
  • ,
  • Estee L. Psaty, BA

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Ola Engelsen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Tromsø, Norway
  • ,
  • Steven Q. Wang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Steven Q. Wang, MD, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 160 E 53 St, New York, NY 10022.
  • ,
  • Allan C. Halpern, MD

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Accepted 21 July 2009. published online 05 April 2010.

See commentary on page 935

Background

The relationship between oral vitamin D supplementation and cutaneous photosynthesis is not well understood.

Objective

We sought to provide estimates of the equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral supplementation.

Methods

Using the FastRT simulation tool, we determined sun exposure times needed to achieve serum vitamin D3 concentrations equivalent to 400 or 1000 IU vitamin D for individuals of various Fitzpatrick skin types living in Miami, FL, and Boston, MA, during the months of January, April, July, and October.

Results

Peak ultraviolet B irradiation for vitamin D synthesis occurs around 12 pm Eastern Standard Time (EST). In Boston, MA, from April to October at 12 pm EST an individual with type III skin, with 25.5% of the body surface area exposed, would need to spend 3 to 8 minutes in the sun to synthesize 400 IU of vitamin D. It is difficult to synthesize vitamin D during the winter in Boston, MA. For all study months in Miami, FL, an individual with type III skin would need to spend 3 to 6 minutes at 12 pm EST to synthesize 400 IU. Vitamin D synthesis occurs faster in individuals with lighter Fitzpatrick skin types. The duration to attain 1000 IU of vitamin D is longer in all scenarios.

Limitations

Results of the computer model are only approximations. In addition, calculations were made based on the assumption that ¼ of 1 minimal erythema dose directed at ¼ body surface area is equal to 1000 IU of oral vitamin D.

Conclusions

Although it may be tempting to recommend intentional sun exposure based on our findings, it is difficult, if not impossible to titrate one's exposure. There are well-known detrimental side effects of ultraviolet irradiation. Therefore, oral supplementation remains the safest way for increasing vitamin D status.

Key words: oral supplementation, ultraviolet irradiation, vitamin D synthesis

Abbreviations used: BSA, body surface area, EST, Eastern Standard Time, IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer, MED, minimal erythema dose, SDD, standard vitamin D dose, UV, ultraviolet

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources: None.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

PII: S0190-9622(09)00948-7

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.028

Refers to article:

  • Commentary: Ultraviolet irradiation and oral ingestion as sources of optimal vitamin D , 05 April 2010

    William G. Tsiaras, Martin A. Weinstock
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology June 2010 (Vol. 62, Issue 6, Pages 935-936)

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 62, Issue 6 , Pages 929.e1-929.e9, June 2010