Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 63, Issue 2 , Pages 235-243, August 2010

Body dysmorphic disorder among dermatologic patients: Prevalence and clinical features

  • Luciana Archetti Conrado, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Luciana Archetti Conrado, MD, PhD, Clinica de Dermatologia Luciana Conrado, Rua Caconde, 96/104. CEP: 01425-010. São Paulo/SP Brazil.
  • ,
  • Ana Gabriela Hounie, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Juliana Belo Diniz, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Victor Fossaluza, MS

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Albina Rodrigues Torres, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Psychology, and Psychiatry of Botucatu Medical School–São Paulo State, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Euripedes Constantino Miguel, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Evandro Ararigboia Rivitti, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

Accepted 18 September 2009. published online 21 June 2010.

Background

An impairing preoccupation with a nonexistent or slight defect in appearance is the core symptom of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), a psychiatric condition common in dermatology settings.

Objective

We sought to determine the prevalence of BDD in dermatologic patients, comparing general and cosmetic settings, and describing some demographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods

In all, 300 patients were consecutively assessed. Screening and diagnoses were performed with validated instruments plus a best estimate diagnosis procedure. The final sample comprised 150 patients in the cosmetic group, 150 patients in the general dermatology group, and 50 control subjects. Standard statistical analyses were performed (χ2, nonparametric tests, logistic regression).

Results

The current prevalence was higher in the cosmetic group (14.0%) compared with general (6.7%) and control (2.0%) groups. No patient had a previous diagnosis. Frequently the reason for seeking dermatologic treatment was not the main BDD preoccupation. Patients with BDD from the cosmetic group were in general unsatisfied with the results of dermatologic treatments.

Limitations

Cross-sectional study conducted in a university hospital is a limitation. It is uncertain if the findings can be generalized. Retrospective data regarding previous treatments are not free from bias.

Conclusions

BDD is relatively common in a dermatologic setting, especially among patients seeking cosmetic treatments. These patients have some different features compared with general dermatology patients. Dermatologists should be aware of the clinical characteristics of BDD to identify and refer these patients to mental health professionals.

Key words: body dysmorphic disorder, body image, body image dissatisfaction, cosmetic procedures, cosmetic treatments, dermatologic symptoms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources: None.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

PII: S0190-9622(09)01210-9

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.09.017

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 63, Issue 2 , Pages 235-243, August 2010