Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 66, Issue 4 , Pages 622-625, April 2012

Current leadership training in dermatology residency programs: A survey

  • David S. Baird, BS

      Affiliations

    • Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
    • ,
  • Magdalena Soldanska, MD

      Affiliations

    • Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
    • ,
  • Bryan Anderson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Bryan Anderson, MD, Department of Dermatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, HU14, Suite 4300, Hershey, PA 17033.
    • ,
  • Jeffrey J. Miller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Accepted 8 October 2009. published online 30 January 2012.

Background

Residents and physicians frequently find themselves in leadership roles. Current residency curricula focus on the development of clinical knowledge and technical skills. A previous survey of Penn State Dermatology graduates demonstrated the perceived need and benefit of a formalized leadership curriculum in this selected group.

Objectives

We sought to identify and measure the perceived need and benefit of formalized leadership training and investigate opinions regarding leadership theory from the perspective of dermatology residency program directors and chief residents nationally.

Methods

A survey containing 26 questions related to leadership theory and training were mailed to all US dermatology residency programs.

Results

In all, 91% of program directors and chief residents agreed that leadership skills could be taught through observation and training. A total of 78% of respondents agreed that leadership training is important during dermatology residency training. In all, 66% agreed that a formalized leadership curriculum would help residents become better resident supervisors and physicians. Only 13% reported having a formalized leadership curriculum. Participants most frequently reported learning leadership through observation and modeled behavior. A total of 15% of chief residents believed their faculty did not effectively model leadership, whereas only 2% of the program directors believed the same (P = .01).

Limitations

In all, 62% (68/109) of programs surveyed returned at least one response from the program director or chief resident. A total of 39% (42/109) had responses from both the program director and the chief resident. Because of the voluntary nature of the survey, response bias could not be excluded.

Conclusion

Most program directors and chief residents believe leadership skills can be cultivated through observation and training. Leadership curriculum is not part of most residency programs.

Key words: leadership, leadership theory, residency training

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Penn State College of Medicine Department of Dermatology.

 Conflicts of interest: None declared.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0190-9622(09)01254-7

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.009

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 66, Issue 4 , Pages 622-625, April 2012

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution