« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 63, Issue 3
, Pages 412-419.e2
, September 2010
Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: A cross-sectional survey
References
- . Dermatoscopy, not dermoscopy!. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:728
- . Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:159–165
- . Increase in the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis by primary care physicians using skin surface microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1016–1020
- . Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:669–676
- . Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1343–1350
- Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the “dermoscopy era”: a retrospective study 1997-2001. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:687–692
- . Accuracy in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126:763–766
- . Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma. Med J Aust. 1997;167:206–210
- . In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100:356S–362S
- The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy: high prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30:551–559
- Epiluminescence microscopy: a useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:286–291
- . Dermatoscopy: usefulness in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous pigmentary lesions. Melanoma Res. 1994;4:391
- . The role of pattern analysis and the ABCD rule of dermoscopy in the detection of histological atypia in melanocytic nevi. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:2907
- . Dermoscopy: what's new?. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27:26–34
- Accuracy of teledermatology for non-pigmented neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:579–588
- Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:329–338
- . Dermatoscopy aids in the diagnosis of the solitary red scaly patch or plaque-features distinguishing superficial basal cell carcinoma, intraepidermal carcinoma, and psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:268–274
- Accuracy of standard dermoscopy for diagnosing scabies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:53–62
- . Dermoscopy slowly gaining dermatologist acceptance. Dermatology Times. January 1, 2005;Available from: URL http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-780119691.htmlAccessed August 3, 2009
- . Management of dysplastic nevi: a survey of fellows of the American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:674–682
- Variation in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of melanoma in situ: a survey of US dermatologists. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:723–729
- Use of and beliefs about dermoscopy in the management of patients with pigmented lesions: a survey of dermatology residency programs in the United States. Melanoma Res. 2002;12:601–605
- . Survey research in dermatology: guidelines for success. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27:121–131vi
- US Census Bureau Regions and Divisions of the United States. Available from: URL:http://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2009.
- Time required for a complete skin examination with and without dermoscopy: a prospective, randomized multicenter study. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:509–513
- . Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of US dermatologists' results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 2002;13:53–58
- . Patch testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members: a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 2003;14:5–11
This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Minneapolis Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0190-9622(09)01351-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.09.050
© 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 63, Issue 3
, Pages 412-419.e2
, September 2010
