Individual drug sampling does not supplant the need for head-to-head trials in dermatology
published online 22 February 2010.
Refers to article:
Drug samples in dermatology: Special considerations and recommendations for the future
, 22 February 2010
Ali Alikhan, Mary Sockolov, Robert T. Brodell, Steven R. Feldman
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
June 2010 (Vol. 62, Issue 6, Pages 1053-1061) Abstract |
Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (142 KB)
A growing body of evidence has highlighted several risks and benefits associated with in-office sampling of prescription medications. While use-testing dermatologic medications from a sample closet may benefit some patients, it seems that the stunning lack of head-to-head trials comparing therapeutic options is a much larger and more important impediment to our determination of when the increased cost of newer agents is justified by superior efficacy, safety, or tolerability. If physicians are to retain the critical autonomy to make independent prescribing decisions in concert with our individual patients, we must take responsibility to call for and generate the comparative data we need to evaluate therapeutic options.
aDepartment of Dermatology, and Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
bDepartments of Dermatology and Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Correspondence to: Jack S. Resneck, Jr, MD, UCSF Dept. of Dermatology, Box 0316, San Francisco, CA 94143-0316.
Funding sources: None.
Disclosure: Dr Resneck serves as the Chair of the Council on Government Affairs, Health Policy, and Practice of the American Academy of Dermatology Association, and Dr VanBeek serves as the Chair of the Academy's Congressional Policy Committee, but this commentary reflects their personal views and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Dermatology Association. Neither of the authors' clinics provide free samples of prescription medications to patients at this time.